More than one third of the world's fish stocks are overexploited. Our ocean is already suffering.

Billions of dollars in government subsidies just encourage more fishing—but we have an opportunity now to end harmful subsidies, helping people and the planet while meeting the deadline for a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 target.

Countries have until the end of 2020 to reach a World Trade Organization (WTO) agreement that would stop harmful fisheries subsidies. If they can't put their differences aside, the deal may fall through. We need your help to make sure it doesn't.

Let's make it happen

Join the campaign

#StopFundingOverfishing

25 reasons to reach a deal

In its 25th year, the WTO has the opportunity to herald a new and better era for people and the planet, and in doing so, reach an SDG 14 target before its deadline.

WTO negotiators have 25 working days between the start of the third meeting cluster on Monday, November 2, and the end of the fourth and last cluster of 2020 on Friday, December 4, to reach an agreement to end harmful fisheries subsidies by the end of the year.

Each day of the countdown, we will give the WTO one more reason to reel in a deal.

Discover more reasons

Globe

Wave of support

176

organizations around the globe urge world leaders to reach a WTO deal to help save our ocean.

Read the statement

What is the problem,
and how can we stop it?

Nearly 90% of global marine fish stocks are fully exploited, overexploited, or depleted, and harmful fisheries subsidies are a big part of the problem. Right now, we have a chance for change—the WTO is working hard to negotiate an agreement to bring these subsidies to an end. You can help.

After
Before

Before

The ocean needs our help. Harmful fisheries subsidies from governments around the world are pushing the fishing industry to fish more and more, distorting the market and directly harming local fishing communities.

Small-scale and artisanal fisheries employ 90% of all fishers, but subsidies disproportionately fund big business. For example, about 78% of total fisheries subsidies in Latin America go to industrial fleets, not small-scale operations. Harmful subsidies, estimated at more than USD 22 billion a year worldwide, artificially reduce fishing costs. Industrial fleets can then afford longer trips, sailing farther to harvest more and more fish, depleting stocks faster than they can recover.

Cheaper gasoline and free nets won’t help anyone in the long run—our current situation threatens long-term food security and livelihoods around the world. More than 820 million people depend on fisheries and aquaculture for food, nutrition, and income. And as our population grows, so does demand.

The trend doesn’t look good—the share of overexploited stocks has tripled since the 1970s. Meanwhile, although addressing harmful fisheries subsidies has been on the WTO’s agenda for nearly twenty years, leaders have not reached an agreement—yet.

After

We have a great opportunity right now to rethink harmful fisheries subsidies. Five years ago, the United Nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet. SDG 14, one of 17 goals, focuses on Life Below Water, and one of the most attainable SDG 14 targets is to prohibit subsidies that contribute to overfishing.

The 2020 deadline for this target is fast approaching. For two years, WTO members have been working intently to reach a deal. The groundwork has been laid—leaders have a strong mandate and more than enough information to reach a meaningful decision.

If we phase out these subsidies responsibly, unsustainable fishing can be controlled, and fish stocks should start to recover. Recovering stocks will eventually boost catch opportunities and revenues for remaining fishing vessels, allowing them to succeed without the need for government subsidies.

Eliminating these subsidies will not require money. Rather, this would free up resources for governments to invest in sustainable fisheries, aquaculture, and coastal communities. It is critical that we take meaningful action now to renew the health of our ocean and sustain fisherpeople and the populations who depend on them.

Impact on people, places and species

Though tuna in the Western and Central Pacific regions are biologically healthy, the number of vessels operating in the fishery is causing a decline in numbers. Even though vessels are catching fewer and fewer fish, they are able to continue operating, in part due to fisheries subsidies keeping them afloat.

For communities in places like Senegal, sardinella play an invaluable economic, social, and cultural role. Overexploitation supported by harmful fuel subsidies is contributing to a worrying decline in stocks and reduced profitability.

Shrimp fisheries in the Eastern Tropical Pacific support at least 140,000 jobs in places like Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, and Ecuador. These jobs are threatened by the current overexploitation of the region’s shrimp stocks by government-subsidized fleets.

Western and Central Pacific

Senegal

Ecuador

Quote

Countries at all stages of development should be prepared to improve the health of their fisheries

Join the campaign

We need all hands on deck to ensure the negotiations are successful. Together, we can spark meaningful change that will renew the health of our ocean while supporting the livelihoods of those who rely on them.

Make waves

Build the wave of support by sharing the message on social media. Tell the world why ending harmful fishing subsidies matters to all of us.

Share

Make waves

Get caught up

Be the first to receive social media content and updates on the current fisheries subsidies negotiations.

Newsletter

Make waves

Supporters